tinanam0102 Peter = my fourth youngest brotherMatt = my third youngest brotherJon = my second / next youngest brotherLuke = my youngest brother Apart from the last, I find these confusing. There are lots of possible ways to explain this. One possiblity: "I'm the oldest of five siblings.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
tinanam0102Peter = my fourth youngest brotherMatt = my third youngest brotherJon = my second / next youngest brotherLuke = my youngest brotherApart from the last, I find these confusing.
BarbaraPACertainly Matthew and Luke were the youngest two, and it says Luke was the baby.Of course, being pedantic, we cannot rule out the possibility that they are both babies, and in particular that they are twins.
tinanam0102The oldest is Mark. Mark refers to his younger brothers in several events as follows:Mark and Matthew are 5 years apartMy younger brother PeterMy next youngest brother JonMy other younger brothers, Matthew and Luke. They were too young at the time.My baby brother Luke.I've just tried to make the maths here but got lost. In my opinion, it doesn't ma
tinanam0102If I am the oldest of five siblings. Peter, Matt, Jon, Luke. Is the following correct?Peter = my fourth youngest brother Matt = my third youngest brother Jon = my second / next youngest brother Luke = my youngest brotherI am going to throw a spanner in the works by saying that I don't agree with GPY's ordering of "Mark, Peter, Jon, Matthew, Luke