The blast occurred as locals were on their way to market near Vadamunai, a village about 70km (45 miles) north-west of the town of Batticaloa.
The rebels have blamed the military for the explosion. A military spokesman denied the allegation. The deaths come a day before rebels and government are to discuss security for truce monitors. Two months of violence have claimed more than 300 lives. Doctors travelling with an International Committee of the Red Cross escort evacuated some of the injured from rebel-held territory.
Dr S Dakshinamoorthy, senior health officer in Batticaloa district, told the BBC they had received nine of the injured, two of whom had later died en route to hospital.
The other seven were now receiving treatment in Batticaloa. "Among the injured one of them is in a serious condition," he said.
The doctor said villagers had told him a three-month-old girl had escaped with minor injuries in the blast, but her mother had been killed.
Rebel spokesman Daya Master said the security forces had planted the mine.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ... they had received nine of the injured
2. ... The doctor said villagers had told him a three-month old girl had escaped with minor injuries in the blast
3. ... security forces had planted the mine
4. ... two of whom had later died en route to hospital.
All those underlined words are the past perfect tense constructions.
I have changed them into the simple past tense. Please read the following:
5. ... they received nine of the injured
6. ... The doctor said the villagers told him a three-month old girl escaped with minor injuries in the blast
7. ... security forces planted the mine
8. ... two of whom later died en route to hospital.
Is it necessary to write the past perfect tense here? Could you write the simple past tense as I suggested?
Top answer
I am surprised; because nobody answered my question.
— Rotter
I am surprised; because nobody answered my question.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
The reason for using past perfect tense is to illustrate the event(s) occurred in the past with more time reference. The during of the event decides whether it requires a simple past pr past perfect tense. e.g. It rained yesterady -finished vs. It had rained for the weeks in March and I was tired of it! Most of t
Thanks Goodman for the reply. It was a good illustration. So if you went to another country for a holiday last week or last month, today you would use the past perfect to describe the proceedings.
“When I went to Italy, I had spent a few days in Venice to join up with a few friends. "
Wouldn't you write the above in the simple past tense?
As I said in the previous post, in daily conversation, people would pay little attention to perfect grammar. My feeling is, yes – a simple past tense is acceptable. Having said that, in spoken English, the sound of “had” is abbreviated to “’d” and therefore sounds like it’s not there. But in reality, it is. For example:
I'm not on holiday, I just had to go to work today. The pay for answering questions about the Past Perfect on the Forum is not enough to cover my cost of living.
The Past Simple could be used in the original article, but the Past Perfect is also correct and it's better. It makes the time sequence clearer, it requires a little less thought from the reader, and it sounds m
No, you would still use the past simple: I spent some memorable time in Rome.
Remember it's when you are relating a past event and need to refer to something even further in the past.
While working on that project in Eurpose last summer (past), I recalled how I had spent a memorable summer there when I was sixteen (even further past).