For vs. To

1. Which preposition in each pair above is correct?-- Both are correct.

2. If both are possible, what is the difference in meaning?-- There is no difference in meaning.

3. Again, if both are possible, which is more natural?-- Both are qute natural.

Thank you very much. I now understand.

Just one more question, if a bus driver asks me "Where do you want to go?", which of the following short response is correct and natural?

Oxford Street.
To Oxford Street.
For Oxford Street.

'Go to...'

I see it would be incomplete if I just replied with "Oxford Street" or "To Oxford Street". I see I should say "Go to Oxford Street".

I hope I've got it right. Thank you so much.

Sorry, I did not see 'Oxford Street' among your options. That too is fine. However, you have misinterpreted my correction. The question was '...go..?', so the responses would be:

Go to Oxford Street

To Oxford Street
Oxford Street.

That's all right. I see all of those three short responses you've written are all correct for the bus driver's question.

However, "Go to Oxford Street" as a response to the driver's question sounds like an imperative statement to my ear if literally translated to my native language, but I think that's one of the differences between English and my native language.

Thank y