Why "or not" isn't used here "Whether (or not) that will result in better quality art seems dubious at best."?? For tech companies, this is a customer satisfaction problem. They will try to solve this problem with more tech — better algorithms, new features, more ways to make one’s way through the digital miasma. It is also why, increasingly, content is created or marketed to make its way through the algorithmic mess. Whether that will result in better quality art seems dubious at best.
Could anyone please explain the parts in bold? "? In most contexts, 'or not' is optional.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Could anyone please explain the parts in bold? Why "or not" isn't used here "Whether (or not) that will result in better quality art seems dubious at best."? In most contexts, 'or not' is optional.
? For tech companies, this is a customer satisfaction problem. They will try to solve this problem with more tech >>>>>>>technology
Just a quick rhetorical question.
How in the world do we go from this in the first sentence:
Hasibrahmanthis is a customer satisfaction problem
To this in the last sentence:
Hasibrahmanbetter quality art
And a few real questions:
Where did this article come from? What was the title of the ar
HasibrahmanWhy "or not" isn't used here
Because it is optional.
Hasibrahmanhey will try to solve this problem with more tech — better algorithms,
You need to read the earlier paragraphs. They explain what they mean here. More technology and better, fancier, more clever algorithms.
If you read the article care