0
EagerSeeker Posted 18 years ago
Grammar

Football / Ice hockey results and scores: How to write and talk

0Hi,02br
02br
00I have been thinking lately how to talk and write about sport results or the score of a game.02br
00Here is how I have figured it out, what do you think?02br
02br
00England is leading/is losing/lost/won (by three to one / 3 - 1)02br
00England is leading/is losing/lost/won (by three goals to one / 3 - 1)02br
00England is leading/is losing/lost/won (by one goal to zero/nil / 3 - 0)02br
00England is leading/is losing/lost/won (two nil/zero / two to nil/zero / 2 - 0) 02br
02br
00The match/game/score is now even 3-3 (three three / three to three) in the second half 05000.02br
00The match/game/score is now even 3-3 in the third period (ice hockey).02br
02br
00Thanks010id68
  

Top answer

01i 00The result is a draw02i 00 . 010id68

  • 01i 00The result is a draw02i 00 .
  • 010id68
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

8 Answers
0
0This is how I would say them 02br
00England is leading/is losing/lost/won (by three to one / 3 - 1) - 01i00England are leading/losing/lost/won three one.02i02br
00England is leading/is losing/lost/won (by three goals to one / 3 - 1) - 01i00OK02i02br
00England is leading/is losing/lost/won (by one goal to zero/nil / 3 - 0
0
0Optilang-02br
02br
00Is that how it is said on sportscasts in England? The team uses a plural verb, even if the noun (England/Manchester United/etc.) is singular? In the US, we'd use the plural only when talking about the team name which is usually plural, eg The Yakees are losing./ New York is losing.02br
02br
00It gets confusing with the modern innova
0
0I've always known it as02br
00Man Utd are02br
00Chelsea have02br
00England are 02br
01i01b00"It's only twelve inches high, solid gold, and it means that England are the world champions!" - 02b02i00Kenneth Wolstenholme, BBC Commentator, describing the moment the England team were presented with the World Cup at W
0
0 01blockquote
01cite10Old Man Gordon12cite10Optilang-12br
12br
10Is that how it is said on sportscasts in England? The team uses a plural verb, even if the noun (England/Manchester United/etc.) is singular? In the US, we'd use the plural only when talking about the team name which is usually plural, eg The Yakees are losing./ New
0
1i00 That is interesting indeed and I agree with you Old Man Gordon. I am from Finland and according to my Finnish-English dictionary I should say "Finland is leading 2-0" without using the plural verb and02br
00"The Finns are leading 2-0" when using a plural expression. But I guess this is just a difference between British and American English.02i
02br
00
0
1blockquote
01cite10optilang12cite10This is how I would say them 12br
12br
10England is leading/is losing/lost/won (by three to one / 3 - 1) - 11i10England are leading/losing/lost/won three one.12i12br
12br
10England is leading/is losing/lost/won (by three goals to one / 3 - 1) - 11i10
0
0It seems that we will find a lot of differences between the Queen's English and American English in this category.02br
02br
00I would say "won three to one" or "won by a score of 3 to 1", not "won by 3 to 1."02br
02br
00even at/ tied at...the 01u00at02u00 is OK, but not necessary. e.g. The score is tied, 3 to 3 (also, three three
0
In BrE, one can use the singular or plural when referring to a team. It can England are leading OR England is leading. In AmE, the singular is used. This is another case of BrE vs AmE.

Related Questions