It seems a metaphor to me.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Jhumjhum ... thought it personification.I don't see how water engulfing paper ships is personification. Why is a person required for ships, paper or otherwise, to be engulfed?
CalifJim Jhumjhum ... thought it personification.I don't see how water engulfing paper ships is personification. Why is a person required for ships, paper or otherwise, to be engulfed?The use of 'treacherous' seems as simple as ordinary exaggeration to me, so I'd call this hyperbole.CJCJ I considered it personification because normally the word treacherous is
JhumjhumI considered it personification because normally the word treacherous is used for person and here the pool is called treacherousYour reasoning is correct.
CalifJimThe use of 'treacherous' seems as simple as ordinary exaggeration to me, so I'd call this hyperbole.And since I lost when it was revealed as a real puddle, I'm with CJ—if the pool is not really treacherous (unstable or insecure, as footing;dangerous; hazardous: a treacherous climb) but just a puddle where the kids enjoy playing.
Jhumjhum... because normally the word treacherous is used for a person ...Not necessarily, especially when applied to an inanimate. Since the noun here is 'pool', which isn't a person, it wasn't the meaning 'traitorous' that came to mind, but 'marked by hidden dangers, hazards, or perils' (Merriam-Webster).