0
Jooney Posted 15 years ago
Grammar

Extraposition

Hi,

Here is part of the conversations I heard while watching a video clip about Kim Kardashian's divorce.

She's been texting with her ex-boyfriend lately. And insiders tell us that Chris caught her doing that. We also know from reports that she had a secret lunch on Octobor 29th in New York with Reggie Bush. That prenup might have some holes in it if it comes to light that she was actually cheating on Chris behind his back.

I have a few questions.

Q1) Is the underliend the extraposition version of the following?

That she was actually cheating on Chris behind his back.(I'll call this "basic version")

Q2) Can you use the basic version instead of the exraposition one?

Q3) If both the basic version and the extrapositon version can be used for the underlined, what prompts one to use one over the other? Is it because the "that-clause" is relatively "heavier" than the rest of the sentence?

Q4) As far as I know, both versions are acceptable, if a content clause represents old information.

A: He didn't return in his term paper until a week after the deadline.

B: It's a miracle that he did it at all.(O)

C: That he did it at all is a miracle.(O)

So, in that respect, the sole reason for using the extraposition version in the original example was that the "that-clause" was longer content-wise. Correct?

I'd really appreciate your help.
  

Top answer

Could someone help me on this?

  • Could someone help me on this?
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

7 Answers
0
Could someone help me on this?
0
Hi,

Here is part of the conversations I heard while watching a video clip about Kim Kardashian's divorce.

She's been texting with her ex-boyfriend lately. And insiders tell us that Chris caught her doing that. We also know from reports that she had a secret lunch on Octobor 29th in New York with Reggie Bush. That prenup might have some holes
0
Thank you for your answers, Clive.

It appears that it is "if" that makes the basic version inadmissible. What if the basic version were used without "if"? Could it be interchangeably used with the basic version? For example,

A: It came to light that she was cheating on Chris behind his back.(O)

B: That she was cheating on Chris behind his back came to light.
0
jooneyQ1) Is the underliend the extraposition version of the following?
That she was actually cheating on Chris behind his back.(I'll call this "basic version")
Roughly, yes. You left out 'comes to light'.

jooneyQ2) Can you use the basic version instead of the exraposition extraposed one?
No.
0
Thank you CJ for your reply.

As I said in my reply to Clive, I too think the "if" is the decisive factor in not allowing the extraposition version.

I'd like to ask you a question about your answer to question #1.

A1) Is the underliend the extraposition version of the following? Roughly, yes.

Could you explain why you wrote "roughly" here?
0
jooneyCould you explain why you wrote "roughly" here?
Just because you didn't use all the words originally underlined in your explanation. It's a minor point.

What you called the 'basic version' should have been

That she was cheating on Chris behind his back came to light.

which is how you presented it in a later post.
0
Oh, I see. Thank you very much Clive and CJ for the help. This forum is like a last resort to me. I study English on my own and there aren't really many people whom I can turn to here in Korea. I appreciate your help very much.

Related Questions