0
PreciousJones Posted 14 years ago
Grammar

Expression or intent?

What's the difference between:

It's been 21 years since I was 5. And

It's been 21 years since I've been 5.

Is there a difference in the expression or intent desired?

Please explain.
  

Top answer

PreciousJones What's the difference between: It's been 21 years since I was 5. And It's been 21 years since I've been 5. Please explain.

  • PreciousJones What's the difference between: It's been 21 years since I was 5.
  • And It's been 21 years since I've been 5.
  • Please explain.
  • There is absolutely no reason to use "been" in your sentences.
  • It is 21 years.....
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

5 Answers
0
PreciousJones What's the difference between:

It's been 21 years since I was 5. And

It's been 21 years since I've been 5.

Is there a difference in the expression or intent desired?Please explain.
There is absolutely no reason to use "been" in your sentences. It is 21 years.....

Likewise, "since I've been fiv
0
canadian45 PreciousJones What's the difference between:It's been 21 years since I was 5. AndIt's been 21 years since I've been 5.Is there a difference in the expression or intent desired?Please explain.There is absolutely no reason to use "been" in your sentences. It is 21 years.....Likewise, "since I've been five" is a very odd thing to say. It's 21 years since I was fiv
0
PreciousJonesIs there a difference in the expression or intent desired?
There's no difference.

Still, there is at least one place in the U.S. where you will hear such constructions. I've known a few people from New York City who say such things. I don't know if it's specific to New York City or if it's a regionalism but I agree with Canadian45 that in
0
The problem with your sentence:
It's been 21 years since I've been 5.

'since' refers to a point in time, the starting point that the speaking is measuring from. The Present Perfect tense is used when we are looking back over a period of time.
It may be easier to unde
0
PreciousJonesThat's not what CaliJim says though... If both of you are native speakers why is there a disagreement here?
I think the verb "to be" might be the problem here because, on its own, it's not very time-specific. It's actually the "5 (years old)" bit that imposes a specific time frame on the verb itself. That said, there is little logic in saying "sin

Related Questions