The same problem seems to arise if God and His purposes are offered as the ultimate explanation of the value and meaning of our lives. The idea that our lives fulfil God's purpose is supposed to give them their point, in a way that doesn't require or admit of any further point. One isn't supposed to ask "What is the point of God?" any more than one is supposed to ask, "What is the explanation of God?"
[What does it all mean? - Thomas Nagel, Chapter X]
I've got some questions to ask.
Thanks
XVI Is "the point of ***" ***'s goal? No. When you ask what the point of something is you're asking to know its purpose .
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
XVIIs "the point of ***" ***'s goal?
No. When you ask what the point of something is you're asking to know its purpose. I suspect, however, not having read much Nagel, that he might be talking about the purpose that human beings may have had in coming up with the idea of ***. In other words, "What is the point of ***?" is somewhat related to "What