0 Yes, but it's rare. 02br 02br 00 At the New York Times you find several:02br 01font 00"these evidences": 02font 02br 05002br 00 but none are shown at the BBC. 02br 02br 00 This is from an AmE dictionary:02br 00 ----02br 01b 00ev·i·dence02b 00 02br 02br 00 Function: 01i 00noun02br 02br 02i 01font 00 Inflected Form(s): 02font 01b 01font 00-s02font 02br 02b 02br 05202br 00 ---------02br 02br 00 Cambridge shows it as U(Uncountable) though: 02br 05102br 02br 00 I'd be01b 00 very02b 00 reserved in using it in the plural.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
01cite10Teo12cite10The 11font10evidences 12font10of this decline include not only results on a variety of objective tests, but also first-hand observations by teachers and professors, and dismaying experiences by employers who have found the end-product seriously lacking.12blockquote
01cite10Yoong Liat12cite10My conclusion is it is used 11font10both by in12font10 American and British English. I don't think Thomas Sowell has used the word wrongly.12br10A typo.0-
12br
12blockquote
01cite10Teo12cite11blockquote11cite20Yoong Liat22cite22br
20My conclusion is it is used 21font20both by in22font20 American and British English. I don't think Thomas Sowell has used the word wrongly.22br
22br
22blockquote