0
JungKim Posted 11 years ago
Grammar

Everything I did was (to) protect YOU.



Mother Gothel: Rapunzel? Rapunzel, what's going on up there? Are you all right?
Rapunzel: [whispers] I'm the lost princess.
Mother Gothel: [sighs] Please speak up, Rapunzel. You know how I hate the mumbling...
Rapunzel: [louder] I am the lost princess! Aren't I?
[Mother Gothel stares in shock]
Rapunzel: Did I mumble, Mother? Or should I even call you that?
Mother Gothel: [pauses, then regains composure] Oh, Rapunzel, do you even hear yourself? Why would you ask such a ridiculous question?
Rapunzel: [pushes her away, angry and frightened] It was you! It was ALL you!
Mother Gothel: [coldly] Everything I did was to protect YOU.

In the last line, which starts at 1:58 of the video above, it's not possible to leave out "to", is it?
  

Top answer

No, you need to there.

  • No, you need to there.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
No, you need to there.
0
Blue JayNo, you need to there.
Is it because the whole sentence means "I did everything to protect you", not "I did nothing but protect you"?
0
To here means in order to, for the purpose of. The whole sentence means Everything I did was because I wanted to protect you.

Related Questions