0
Usenet Posted 22 years ago
Usage

Every man for themselves

I know this is an old, much discussed subject. But the following quotation, taken from Time magazine Letters to the Editor (July 19, 2004 edition) sacrifices clarity for the sake of political correctness:

"A person's actions speak for themselves" (p. number blank, according to Time's usage of numbering only some of its pages).
The letter was about Clinton's book; I believe its author wanted to say that Clinton's actions are a reflection of Clinton's character, and did not intend to give actions a mind of their own.
  

Top answer

[nq:1]I know this is an old, much discussed subject. But the following quotation, taken from Time magazine Letters to the ... [/nq] Why do you believe that?

  • [nq:1]I know this is an old, much discussed subject.
  • But the following quotation, taken from Time magazine Letters to the ...
  • [/nq] Why do you believe that?
  • The phrase is usually something like "His actions speak for themselves", never "His actions speak for himself".
  • Matti
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

9 Answers
0
[nq:1]I know this is an old, much discussed subject. But the following quotation, taken from Time magazine Letters to the ... Clinton's actions are a reflection of Clinton's character, and did not intend to give actions a mind of their own.[/nq]
Why do you believe that?
The phrase is usually something like "His actions speak for themselves", never "His actions speak for himself".
Matti
0
[nq:1]I know this is an old, much discussed subject. But the following quotation, taken from Time magazine Letters to the ... Clinton's actions are a reflection of Clinton's character, and did not intend to give actions a mind of their own.[/nq]
Someone's actions (or other things) "speaking for themselves" is a long-established idiom meaning roughly "require no further elaboration". It has not
0
[nq:1]I know this is an old, much discussed subject. But the following quotation, taken from Time magazine Letters to the ... Clinton's actions are a reflection of Clinton's character, and did not intend to give actions a mind of their own.[/nq]
Someone's actions (or other things) "speaking for themselves" is a long-established idiom meaning roughly "require no further elaboration". It has not
0
[nq:1]I know this is an old, much discussed subject. But the following quotation, taken from Time magazine Letters to the ... Clinton's actions are a reflection of Clinton's character, and did not intend to give actions a mind of their own.[/nq]
I haven't seen this particular example of its use, but I've always taken the idiom to mean precisely that the referrant of "themselves" being "actions
0
[nq:2]I know this is an old, much discussed subject. But ... not intend to give actions a mind of their own.[/nq]
[nq:1]Why do you believe that?[/nq]
Because of the context:
"Good men do not have to explain themselves, just as good Presidents do not have to write books to shape their legacy or justify their deeds. A person's actions speak for themselves."
[nq:1]The phrase is usuall
0
I believe you, without having to look up the archives, but thank you anyway.
[nq:1]Among the art-treasures of Europe there are pictures which These facts speak for themselves.[/nq]
There is also a Latin expression "Res ipsa loquitur", which I should've remembered before I started this unfortunate thread.
0
Right, "res ipsa loquitur".
Thank you for the lesson and TIA to anyone who may post to this thread. Sometimes we learn the hard way.
0
[nq:1]"Good men do not have to explain themselves, just as good Presidents do not have to write books to shape their legacy or justify their deeds. A person's actions speak for themselves."[/nq]
This is exactly the common sense. A good president's deeds need nobody to speak for them (justify them). They speak for themselves, their justification being obvious to all observers.

(snip)
0
[nq:1]On 14 Jul 2004, Arcadian Rises wrote[/nq]
[nq:2]I know this is an old, much discussed subject. But ... not intend to give actions a mind of their own.[/nq]
[nq:1]I haven't seen this particular example of its use, but I've always taken the idiom to mean precisely that the referrant of "themselves" being "actions". (The meaning of the actions needs no additional explanation or elaborat

Related Questions