0
OttoJ Posted 11 years ago
Grammar

Eric's grammar

A grammarian says,

p.285
-What a difference since I have used body wash!

is wrong, and only 'used', the simple past, is possible. This comment is different from what I know: 'have used' means the act of using has continued up to now; 'used' means 'using' is in the past, and you're no longer using it: a difference probably about your body has taken place since you last used it. That body wash has nothing to do with this difference. I think 'have used' and 'used' are both correct, with difference in meaning. But the writer was a man of great intelligence, so I can't presume to think that I could beat him at his first language. What's your opinion?
  

Top answer

OttoJ What's your opinion? I don't find either form ('have used', 'used') objectionable, but I would use 'have been using'. I can't imagine that one use of the product could make a big difference, but continuous use might.

  • OttoJ What's your opinion?
  • I don't find either form ('have used', 'used') objectionable, but I would use 'have been using'.
  • I can't imagine that one use of the product could make a big difference, but continuous use might.
  • CJ
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
OttoJWhat's your opinion?
I don't find either form ('have used', 'used') objectionable, but I would use 'have been using'.

I can't imagine that one use of the product could make a big difference, but continuous use might.

CJ

Related Questions