0
Rizan Malik Posted 6 years ago
Grammar

Equivalent of what the third conditional is for the past

1) The second conditional is the present/future equivalent of what the third conditional is for the past.

How do I understand the underlined clause?

The second conditional is the present/future equivalent of that which the third conditional is [ ??? ] for the past.

Is it a relative clause? If so, what is it that is missing in the brackets [ ]?

  

Top answer

Rizan Malik 1) The second conditional is the present/future equivalent of what the third conditional is for the past . How do I understand the underlined clause? Like this: Rizan Malik The second conditional is the present/future equivalent of that which the third conditional is [ ???

  • Rizan Malik 1) The second conditional is the present/future equivalent of what the third conditional is for the past .
  • How do I understand the underlined clause?
  • Like this: Rizan Malik The second conditional is the present/future equivalent of that which the third conditional is [ ???
  • ] for the past.
  • Rizan Malik Is it a relative clause?
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
Rizan Malik

1) The second conditional is the present/future equivalent of what the third conditional is for the past.

How do I understand the underlined clause?

Like this:

Rizan MalikThe second conditional is the present/future equivalent of that which the third conditional is [ ??? ] for the past.

Related Questions