"is to be" often has the sense that there is a human plan, or intention, that something will happen. In some contexts this is fairly obvious anyway, even with "will be", so there isn't a huge difference in meaning. " To me, the latter just sounds slightly more "impersonal", distancing us slightly from the people who will do the development.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Anonymous"... is to be developed..." and ".. will be developed.."Yes, there is a difference, but not a big one.doesIs there is any difference intheretheir intepretation?