0
Anonymous Posted 12 years ago
Grammar

English Grammar

Can someone explain the grammatical difference between:

1. I met a king of England
2. I met a king from France
  

Top answer

The only grammatical difference is the preposition (of, from). Different words make a semantic (meaning) difference.

  • The only grammatical difference is the preposition (of, from).
  • Different words make a semantic (meaning) difference.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

11 Answers
0
The only grammatical difference is the preposition (of, from).
Different words make a semantic (meaning) difference.
0
Anonymous grammatical difference
There is no grammatical difference given that both sentences end with the same grammatical structure — a prepositional phrase.

As far as the content goes, I doubt you are old enough to have met either king. It's possible that someone alive today might have met the most recent King of England (George VI, died 1952), bu
0
Is it not the case that

1. I met a king of England is a noun phrase

while

2. I met a king from France is a prepositional phrase
?
0
AnonymousIs it not the case that1. I met a king of England is a noun phrasewhile2. I met a king from France is a prepositional phrase?
No. I think you are misunderstanding something.

Both of your underlined phrases are noun phrases. And both "of England" and "from France" are prepositional phrases.

CJ
0
CalifJimAnd both "of England" and "from France" are prepositional phrases.
And, CJ, would you also describe the prepositional phrases as post-modifiers of the preceding noun?
0
Anonymous2. I met a king from France is a prepositional phrase
A prepositional phrase has an initial head-word that is a preposition. The word "a" is an article, so the phrase that you underlined cannot be a prepositional phrase.
0
AlpheccaStarswould you also describe the prepositional phrases as post-modifiers of the preceding noun?
I am told that "of England" is a complement of "king", but "from France" is a post-modifier (an adjunct), although in the right context it may be possible that "from France" might also be a complement. Frankly, I'm not sure about some of this new ter
0
So the different nature of the prepositions (from, of) do make for a grammatical difference, at least in how those parts would be analyzed in detail.

Structurally, there is no difference, though.
0
CalifJimNote: a king of England from France.
That would have been William the Conqueror. Emotion: smile
0
AlpheccaStarsWilliam the Conqueror
Indeed. And don't get me started on the kings of England from Germany.

Related Questions