Emerge from (the) mist/fog

Question

Hello.1. The boat emerged from mist/fog.2. The boat emerged from the mist/fog.If no mist/fog has been previously mentioned, can I assume that1. No article - correct (introducing the noun)2. Definite article - correct as well (the reader assumes it's the mist/fog that's there).Thank you.

Blue Jay · Accepted Answer

Hi, Pieter. Welcome to EnglishForward.
Either sentence is possible, but I would be more likely to use #2.

Pieter Waan · Answer

Blue JayHi, Pieter. Welcome to EnglishForward. Either sentence is possible, but I would be more likely to use #2.

Thank you, Blue Jay! But, as I understand you, #1 is grammatically acceptable as well? That is, for you #2 is a matter of preference?

Pieter

Blue Jay · Answer

It's a bit more nuanced than that. In most situations, you would use the article. For example, if you were describing the situation from the point of view of an onlooker, even if the onlooker isn't specified, you would naturally use the article.
"She stood on the cliff, looking out to sea, heedless of the cold and damp. All at once, a boat emerged from the fog..." Here it would sound odd without the article, even if the fog had not been mentioned before.
You might omit the article if you were describing a situation such as a shipwreck or battle where you are writing from a neutral, omniscient point of view.
"At 17:15 the 74-gun Hero emerged from fog and was fired upon by the Argonauta, at which point the España opened up against the retreating Sirius." (A History of the Royal Navy: Napoleonic Wars, by Martin Robson). Here the article is optional (as the fog had in fact been mentioned earlier in the original text) but it would be preferable to omit it if it had not.

Pieter Waan · Answer

Blue JayIt's a bit more nuanced than that. In most situations, you would use the article. For example, if you were describing the situation from the point of view of an onlooker, even if the onlooker isn't specified, you would naturally use the article."She stood on the cliff, looking out to sea, heedless of the cold and damp. All at once, a boat emerged from the fog..." Here it would sound odd without the article, even if the fog had not been mentioned before.You might omit the article if you were describing a situation such as a shipwreck or battle where you are writing from a neutral, omniscient point of view."At 17:15 the 74-gun Hero emerged from fog and was fired upon by the Argonauta, at which point the España opened up against the retreating Sirius." (A History of the Royal Navy: Napoleonic Wars, by Martin Robson). Here the article is optional (as the fog had in fact been mentioned earlier in the original text) but it would be preferable to omit it if it had not.

Thank you, Blue Jay, for such a nuanced reply. I appreciate it a lot. Many thanks!

Emerge from (the) mist/fog

Top answer

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

Related Questions