0
HUBLOT Posted 14 years ago
Grammar
Emcee for something
http://alturl.com/qs5cr
In terms of Hallyu events she emceed for the “Music Bank in Tokyo, K-Pop Festival” on July 13, 2011 and “Seoul-Tokyo Music Festival 2011” on November 9.
I'm wondering if for is necessary.
In terms of Hallyu events she emceed for the “Music Bank in Tokyo, K-Pop Festival” on July 13, 2011 and “Seoul-Tokyo Music Festival 2011” on November 9.
I'm wondering if for is necessary.
Top answer
Strictly speaking, I'd say yes. To me, it makes the sentence flow more naturally. If we were to replace the (fairly recent) word emceed* with the original term, the use of "for" becomes evident.
- Strictly speaking, I'd say yes.
- To me, it makes the sentence flow more naturally.
- If we were to replace the (fairly recent) word emceed* with the original term, the use of "for" becomes evident.
- In terms of Hallyu events, she was the master of ceremonies for the “Music Bank in Tokyo, K-Pop Festival” on July 13, 2011 and ( the )“Seoul-Tokyo Music Festival 2011” on November 9.
- On the other hand, omitting "for" would not change the meaning of the sentence and the reader would still be able to understand what was said.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
Strictly speaking, I'd say yes. To me, it makes the sentence flow more naturally. If we were to replace the (fairly recent) word emceed* with the original term, the use of "for" becomes evident.
In terms of Hallyu events, she was the master of ceremonies for the “Music
In terms of Hallyu events, she was the master of ceremonies for the “Music
0
Related Questions