Edit my essay please. Thanks a lot

Some people argue for a broad university education in which students learn about many different subjects. Others argue for specialized university education in which students learn only about a specific field of study.
I strongly oppose with education in which students have to learn about diversity of subjects, because of the organizations which are run in businesses, and the situation of each person in his or her career. Also a person will be confused and will feel that he is capable to learn in a broad university education, for one has special talents and cannot learn all the subjects.
Nowadays, all works are done in an organized way, in which each person has a particular responsibilities and anybody expects them further work. Everybody does his job and after obtaining the results pass it on to the next person in other position. For instance, I work in a company as a petro-physicist and I do my job preciously. I do not need to know what my colleagues do with the results of my work; therefore it is enough to me to have a perfect knowledge in my own field of study.
On the other hand, people do not have equal talents and their talents are different. For example, one with intelligence in learning foreign languages may be weak in learning mathematics. It is parents’ and teachers’ responsibility to discover the students’ talent and let them to improve in that field. In my opinion, spending time for learning other subjects is wasting time; moreover it will make students to be disappointed when they feel incapable of learning some subjects.
To sum up, the efficiency of a specialized education is much more than that of a broad university education. Because of the organization of works, in which each worker should have a special proficiency, I think that students do not need to learn a wide variety of subjects. Each student should choose a field of study based on his or her favorite subjects and potential on learning to be successful in both study and work.