" I would assume this means "influence the final outcome/result" at the end of the day. It's certainly possible that a minor detail can end up having a major impact but why would the writer/speaker not be willing to pay attention to such a detail if he/she were aware of this possibility? That seems to me to be the illogical aspect.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
bwkcajcaTo me the problem isn't with the logic of the sentence as much as it is with the expression "hold crucial influence." I would assume this means "influence the final outcome/result" at the end of the day.It's certainly possible that a minor detail can end up having a major impact but why would the writer/speaker not be willing to pay attention to such a detail if h
bwkcajcaIt's certainly possible that a minor detail can end up having a major impact but why would the writer/speaker not be willing to pay attention to such a detail if he/she were aware of this possibility?Maybe you misread it? Maybe you missed the double negative?
GCheng620why would the author call the detail "minor" if it has the potential to be crucial to the subject matter?You may be missing the intent of the author.
GCheng620I think the speaker should just drop the word "minor."But recall that we don't know which details may become crucial later. Given this time sequence, does "minor" make sense to you now?