Does this sentence make sense?
Is Mauritius, then, an example of a country that has squared the circle between simultaneously increasing economic growth and decreasing inequality; therefore, achieving the ultimate goal of all socio-economic development, which, according to Rostow is the ‘Age of Mass Consumption’?
Does this sentence make sense? How can it be improved? Thank you.
Top answer
Is Mauritius, then, an example of a country that has squared the circle between simultaneously increasing economic growth and decreasing inequality , thus achieving the ultimate goal of all socio-economic development, which no comma according to Rostow is the ‘Age of Mass Consumption’? The semi-colon does not work, as what follows it is not a sentence that can stand alone. Also, semi-colons usually don't work well with questions.
- Is Mauritius, then, an example of a country that has squared the circle between simultaneously increasing economic growth and decreasing inequality , thus achieving the ultimate goal of all socio-economic development, which no comma according to Rostow is the ‘Age of Mass Consumption’?
- The semi-colon does not work, as what follows it is not a sentence that can stand alone.
- Also, semi-colons usually don't work well with questions.
- Do you mean that Rostow says the the ultimate goal of all socio-economic development is the ‘Age of Mass Consumption'?
- I don't understand what this means.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Is Mauritius, then, an example of a country that has squared the circle between simultaneously increasing economic growth and decreasing inequality, thus achieving the ultimate goal of all socio-economic development, which no comma according to Rostow is the ‘Age of Mass Consumption’?
The semi-colon does not work, as what follows it is not a sentence th
0
Related Questions