Does this make sense?
It should be little surprise to biological anthropologists that the pioneering refractory experimentalism of 19th century anatomy spurred Huxley and later Darwin to conclude that the Homininae clade, which comprises the three African hominin lineages, Pan, Homo, and Gorilla, thought to have diverged in the late Miocene, are the closest living relatives of modern H. sapiens.
Is the above sentence grammatically correct?
Should it be 'living relatives of...' or living relatives to...'?
Top answer
It should be little surprise to biological anthropologists that the pioneering refractory experimentalism of 19th century anatomy spurred Huxley and later Darwin to conclude that the Homininae clade, ( which comprises the three African hominin lineages, Pan, ****, and Gorilla ) thought to have diverged in the late Miocene, are the closest living relatives of modern H. sapiens. Is the above sentence grammatically correct?
- It should be little surprise to biological anthropologists that the pioneering refractory experimentalism of 19th century anatomy spurred Huxley and later Darwin to conclude that the Homininae clade, ( which comprises the three African hominin lineages, Pan, ****, and Gorilla ) thought to have diverged in the late Miocene, are the closest living relatives of modern H.
- sapiens.
- Is the above sentence grammatically correct?
- Yes, but I've added brackets to clarify that thought to have diverged in the late Miocene he refers to the Homininae clade'.
- '?
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
It should be little surprise to biological anthropologists that the pioneering refractory experimentalism of 19th century anatomy spurred Huxley and later Darwin to conclude that the Homininae clade, ( which comprises the three African hominin lineages, Pan, ****, and Gorilla ) thought to have diverged in the late Miocene, are the closest living relatives of modern H. sapiens.
0
Related Questions