MOre:
Perhaps in rejecting the critical dualism–Lincoln as individual emancipator pitted against collective self-emancipators–there is an opportunity to recognise the greater persuasiveness of the combination. In a sense, yes: a racist, flawed Lincoln did something heroic, and not in lieu of collective participation, but next to, and enabled, by it. To venerate a singular ‘Great Emancipator’ may be as reductive as dismissing the significance of Lincoln’s actions. Who he was as a man, no one of us can ever really know. So it is that the version of Lincoln we keep is also the version we make.[79]
NL888 Does "the combination" refer to "collective self-emancipators"? No. It refers to "individual emancipator [and] collective self-emancipators".
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
NL888Does "the combination" refer to "collective self-emancipators"?No. It refers to "individual emancipator [and] collective self-emancipators".
MIGWhat dose "collective self-emancipators" mean?I'll let NL 888 answer that—he's the one who's reading the book.
MIGIs this correct?"A collective aim and participation for emancipation"What is it supposed to mean?