Does somebody know

What a tremendous phrase!

I guess it's meant to be amusing. "adultery" is a black-and-white thing. It doesn't come in "mild" and "severe" forms.

I'm sorry, I did't quite understand.

When I heard it, it did'nt sound amusing.

It sounded like some kind of adultery.

Do you maybe have some other ideas?

Thanks.

AnonymousDo you maybe have some other ideas?

I'm afraid not. To me it means nothing more than "mild" + "adultery". And, as I say, the idea that there could be a mild form of adultery -- i.e. a form that is somehow less serious or severe -- strikes me as an amusingly strange one.

AnonymousDo you maybe have some other ideas?

REPOST.

I'm afraid not. To me it means nothing more than "mild" + "adultery". And, as I say, the idea that there could be a mild form of adultery -- i.e. a form that is somehow less serious or severe -- strikes me as an amusingly strange one.

There are references to "mild adultery" in several old texts - the theological writings of Emanuel Swedenborg (d. 1772) refers to the "mild" type as having characteristics that make the adultery (which is always immoral) less odious; one such statement suggests that the "degree of opposition" defines how mild or "grievous" the adultery. In other writings, Swedenborg suggests that circumstances, s

In my opinion, you can't rank adultery on the scale of acuteness or seriousness. Adultery is, well..., what it is; you can't grade it, can you?