Context:
Harris continues by examining the nature of belief itself, challenging the notion that we can in any sense enjoy
freedom of belief, and arguing that "belief is a fount of action
in potentia." Instead he posits that in order to be useful, beliefs must be both logically coherent, and truly representative of the real world. Insofar as
religious belief fails to ground itself in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empirical evidence, Harris likens religion to a form of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_illness which, he says, "allows otherwise normal human beings to reap the fruits of madness and consider them
holy." He argues that there may be "
sanity in numbers", but that it is "merely an accident of history that it is considered normal in our society to believe that the Creator of the universe can hear your prayers, while it is demonstrative of mental illness to believe that he is communicating with you by having the rain tap in Morse code on your bedroom window."