" It's not correct. The writer probably meant "were not done with a completely free hand". The 'not' modifies (negates) the whole idea "done with a completely free hand".
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
park sang joonI'd like to know whether "not" modifies only "with a completely free hand" or "with a completely free hand" along with "were don."It's not correct. The writer probably meant "were not done with a completely free hand". The 'not' modifies (negates) the whole idea "done with a completely free hand".
park sang joonThank you, Mr.Jim for your valuable answer. Then, can I take it that "not" always modifies a main verb along with following words after "not"?Always? No, not always. < In the preceding phrase, 'not' only modifies the adverb 'always'.
park sang joonThen can I take it that "not" modifies only words followingNo. It's the most usual pattern, but it's not always that way. For example,after"not"?
park sang joonThen can I take it that "not" modifies words following after "not" along with an auxiliary verb immediately preceding "not."Yes, that sounds more reasonable, but even that doesn't always work. Sometimes negation "floats left"— to a clause with 'want' or 'think', for example.
1) I do not want you to open the window c