0
NL888 Posted 13 years ago
Grammar

Does "for" mean "directly associated with" here?

Context:
Although several psychological theories predict that members of stigmatized groups should have low global self-esteem, empirical research typically does not support this prediction. It is proposed here that this discrepancy may be explained by considering the ways in which membership in a stigmatized group may protect the self-concept. It is proposed that members of stigmatized groups may (a) attribute negative feedback to prejudice against their group, (b) compare their outcomes with those of the ingroup, rather than with the relatively advantaged outgroup, and (c) selectively devalue those dimensions on which their group fares poorly and value those dimensions on which their group excels. Evidence for each of these processes and their consequences for self-esteem and motivation is reviewed. Factors that moderate the use of these strategies and implications of this analysis for treatment of stigmas are also discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
  

Top answer

NL888 Evidence for each of these processes and their consequences for self-esteem and motivation is reviewed. The 1st for means 'in favor of'. The 2nd for means 'related to'

  • NL888 Evidence for each of these processes and their consequences for self-esteem and motivation is reviewed.
  • The 1st for means 'in favor of'.
  • The 2nd for means 'related to'
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
NL888Evidence for each of these processes and their consequences for self-esteem and motivation is reviewed.
The 1st for means 'in favor of'.
The 2nd for means 'related to'
0
Sorry the "for" refers to " Evidence for each of these processes and their consequences for self-esteem and motivation is reviewed. "

Does "for" mean "directly associated with" here?

Related Questions