0
Anonymous Posted 16 years ago
Grammar

Does & Do usages combined with Have & Has

In my mind, most simple explanation =
Does: singular, Do: plural/personal
Has: singular, Have: plural/personal

Obviously it's not THAT simple, but for now let's live by Occams Razor.

Then I recently wrote this sentence:
Does no one have..... etc.
Which then caused me to think over and over the proper grammar for that sentence. My grammar is usually pretty good; and I know the common usage of these words. My confusion comes as I try to figure out the correct usage.

What do you think?
  

Top answer

Hi, In my mind, most simple explanation = Does: singular, Do: plural/personal Has: singular, Have: plural/personal What do you mean by 'personal'? I don't understand what difficulty you are considering. As you probably know, the standard is Do I have .

  • Hi, In my mind, most simple explanation = Does: singular, Do: plural/personal Has: singular, Have: plural/personal What do you mean by 'personal'?
  • I don't understand what difficulty you are considering.
  • As you probably know, the standard is Do I have .
  • .
  • Do you have .
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

7 Answers
0
Hi,

In my mind, most simple explanation =

Does: singular, Do: plural/personal

Has: singular, Have: plural/personal

What do you mean by 'personal'?

I don't understand what difficulty you are considering. As you probably know, the standard is

Do I have . . .

Do you have . . .

Does he have . . .

0
The rules weren't what bothered me. By "personal" I meant {I, you}.
And I realize 'no-one' is singular.

which is why i got confused:

On it's own, it would be:

No-one has...

But when using "does" it becomes:

Does no-one have...
0
Hi,

Sorry, I'm confused. Do you have a question you want to ask?

Clive
0
I said in both posts that using
Does no one have...
sounds correct, but when considering rules, it's very weird.

On it's own, it would be:

No-one has...

But when using "does" it becomes:

Does no-one have...

This is my question. Is there justification for doing this? Alternately, I was just looking for input, nothing really depends on my
0
I found the correct description I was looking for in another thread:
Grammar GeekHas is used ONLY with third person singular: he, she, it.
I have, you have, we have, they have, he has.
In normal speech, "anybody" would take the third person singular: If anyone has a converter, could you ...
However, as CB says in the post above yours, once you have a form of "t
0
Hi,

Tom has . . . Does Tom have . . .



With the auxiliary verb 'do/does', the infinitive form 'have' is used.



Does that help?



Clive
0
Hi, and welcome to 2015.

The reason is that the "have" in "does no-one have" is in the infinitive - it's NOT the present tense, so it not conjugated and doesn't need to agree with the subject (no-one).

Related Questions