Context:
Next, Harris goes on to outline what he terms a "science of good and evil" – a rational approach to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics, which he claims must necessarily
be predicated upon questions of human
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Happiness and suffering. He talks about the need to sustain "moral communities," a venture in which he feels that the separate religious moral identities of the "saved" and the "damned" can play no part. But Harris is critical of the stance of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_relativism, and also of what he calls "the false choice of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacifism." In another controversial passage, he compares the ethical questions raised by
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collateral_damage and judicial
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torture during war. He concludes that collateral damage is more ethically troublesome. "If we are unwilling to torture, we should be unwilling to wage modern war," Harris concludes.