Does "Albert had assumed credit for that which Mileva had accomplished" mean...?

Does "Albert had assumed credit for that which Mileva had accomplished" mean "the credit should belongs to Mileva who accomplished the study in the paper, but Albert Einstein took the credit as his own"?

Context:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Harris_Walker, who argued that Mileva was co-author, or sole author, of the 1905 papers, quoted some of Albert's words, as found in The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, and bear in mind that the vast majority of Mileva's letters to Albert were destroyed, with there being no more likely reasons for their destruction, than to hide her contribution and the fact that the works were unoriginal, "I find statements in 13 of [Albert's] 43 letters to [Mileva] that refer to her research or to an ongoing collaborative effort -- for example, in document 74, 'another method which has similarities with yours.'^[37] In document 75, Albert writes: 'I am also looking forward very much to our new work. You must now continue with your investigation.' In document 79, he says, 'we will send it to Wiedermann's Annalen.' In document 96, he refers to 'our investigations'; in document 101, to 'our theory of molecular forces.' In document 107, he tells her: 'Prof. Weber is very nice to me. . . I gave him our paper.'"

• Why did the Nobel committee not award Einstein the Nobel Prize for his work on relativity theory? Could it have been that all who were familiar with the facts, knew that Einstein did not originate the major concepts behind relativity theory?
• Mileva and Albert had coauthored papers before and Albert had assumed credit for that which Mileva had accomplished. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Senta_Tr%C3%B6mel-Pl%C3%B6tz&action=edit&redlink=1 presented a thorough account of Albert's shameless appropriation of Mileva's work and of Mileva's acquiescence.^[38]