Hi, I would word things the same as your grammar book does. It might be easier to generally think of using "a" with a singular noun (doctor, job) and "any" with a plural noun (doctors, jobs).
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
CalifJimThe example with job is easier. It's expected that a person has a job or not. It's less expected that a person has more than one job.Thank you for your detailed explanation, Cal
She's got a job. She hasn't got a job.
She hasn't got any jobs is strange because we don't expect someone to have more than one job at a time.
do you think both "She hasn't got any job." and "She hasn't got any jobs" are inapproreate?"Inappropriate for what?" is the question. For a very neutral statement that the woman is unemployed, we'd say She hasn't got a job. I have already illustrated a situation where She hasn't
People who do freelance work could use "jobs" in the plural like that.Ah, yes. Quite true, She doesn't have any jobs makes sense if you change from definition "3c: a regular remunerative position" (which I was talking about)
For a very neutral statement that the woman is unemployed, ...to definition "1a: a piece of work; espec
CalifJimI totally agree with you.
But I can't think how She doesn't have any jobs could be used to mean She doesn't have any regular remunerative positions. It strikes me as very unusual.
CJ