a) In 2017, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_(magazine) recognized her as one of the Silence Breakers, the magazine's Person of the Year, for speaking out about harassment.
b) The committee of the railway institute— the stute as it's effectionately known locally— has confirmed it will close this Summer.
Is there a distinction between the usage of commas and dashes when separating information this way in this example?
Same question in this example? Is it still a relative clause without (which was) or do you view it as an interjection as written?
a) The book, published to coincide with the event, was a best-seller.
b) The race, like most races, was exhausting.
The book, which was published to coincide with the event, was a best-seller.
Is there a distinction between the usage of commas and dashes when separating information this way in this example? Not really. You could also use parentheses.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Is there a distinction between the usage of commas and dashes when separating information this way in this example?
Not really. You could also use parentheses.
In standard writing, I'd suggest just commas. Sprinkling your writing with a lot of dashes and parentheses starts to give the impression that you don't care much about structuring your sentences correctly.
Clive