0
Taka Posted 19 years ago
Grammar

disadvantaged

·disadvantaged: in socially or economically deprived circumstances.

http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/disadvantage?view=uk

Is that word 'disadvantaged' necessarily about something social or economic?

Isn't it also possible that the word implies something developmental or physical?
  

Top answer

Taka · disadvantaged: in socially or economically deprived circumstances . view=uk Is that word 'disadvantaged' necessarily about something social or economic? Isn't it also possible that the word implies something developmental or physical?

  • Taka · disadvantaged: in socially or economically deprived circumstances .
  • view=uk Is that word 'disadvantaged' necessarily about something social or economic?
  • Isn't it also possible that the word implies something developmental or physical?
  • Yes.
  • People have started using it in place of the word 'disabled' because it is seen as more politically correct.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

16 Answers
0
Taka ·disadvantaged: in socially or economically deprived circumstances.

http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/disadvantage?vi
0
Good. Then, if you saw the words 'disadvantaged children' without context, which interpretation (i.e. your default interpretation) would you come up with first?

(1) developmentally disabled children

(2) children with social/economic problems
0
It will depend on context, but generally I would read this as referring to social disadvantage.
0
TakaGood. Then, if you saw the words 'disadvantaged children' without context, which interpretation (i.e. your default interpretation) would you come up with first?

(1) developmentally disabled children

(2) children with social/economic problems
Because of political correctness, a lot of words have been created to soften up the harsh ton
0
An aside to Goodman [People say" life is a bowl of cherries". But why do I always get the sour ones?] It's better than always getting the pits.
0
Feebs11It will depend on context, but generally I would read this as referring to social disadvantage.
Without context, I would agree with Feebs.
0
I think I would default to "social" too.

(There's nothing wrong with sour cherries, by the way...in the right context...)

MrP
0
PhilipAn aside to Goodman [People say" life is a bowl of cherries". But why do I always get the sour ones?] It's better than always getting the pits.
0
MrPedantic
I think I would default to "social" too.

Does it follow that the 'developmental' usage is not as widely used yet as the 'social/economical' one?
0
Hello,

we are making increasing use of euphemistic paraphrase. We turn our backs on expressions like the poor and embrace the economically disadvantaged. This is all very well; it is rather when the trend is taken to the extreme and the short people find themselves referred to as the vertically challenged, or the bald the follically challenged, that there is a risk of things getting out o

Related Questions