0 When an acquaintance of mine asked where I was the other day, I told her "I needed to watch a tv show...it was of dire consequence" She immediately began to argue with me that I used the phrase "dire consequence" incorrectly. She said I could have said that it was a dire situation but not a dire consequence. I was trying to imply sarcasm in my statment if that has any bearing. Who was correct?02br 02br 00Thanks, and I love the idea and execution of the site!02br 02br 00Brian0-
Top answer
010id5
— Inchoateknowledge
010id5
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0 It is six of one and half a dozen of the other.02br 00Squabling is a very bad thing ( 05000 )02br 00dire consequences means your friend will have bad things happening to him because of what he had done.010id5
0 Yeah, but if I said this in jest or in an attempt to be funny...would this be grammatically correct? She wasn't arguing the context of the situation, she was just saying I was flat out wrong for using the word consequence. THIS is what I'm asking for clarification on, not if the situation warranted my word selection. I wouldn't even care except arguing this point was basically the first thing
0 The word 01i00of02i00 makes all the difference.02br 02br 00 The need you speak of is a dire situation, and it is not in itself 01i00a02i00 dire consequence. Therefore it is truly 01i00of02i00 dire consequence, as you said, i.e., it concerns or involves the possibility that a dire consequence will ensue