Difference between "which" and "that"

(1) This is the book that I have been looking for. > The intention may be the type of the book.
(2) This is the book which I have been looking for. > The intention may be the specific book.
I may be wrong.

(in response to this, which was snipped:
[nq:2]could anybody make up two sentences to illustrate the exclusive usage of "which" or "that"?)[/nq]
[nq:1](1) This is the book that I have been looking for. > The intention may be the type of the book. (2) This is the book which I have been looking for. > The intention may be the specific book. I may be wrong.[/nq]
You are. Quite thoro

[nq:1]could anybody make up two sentences to illustrate the exclusive usage of "which" or "that"?[/nq]
Toys that are harmful to children should be banned.

Toys, which are harmfulk to chilsdren, should be banned.

Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
http://www.geo

[nq:2]could anybody make up two sentences to illustrate the exclusive usage of "which" or "that"?[/nq]
[nq:1]Toys that are harmful to children should be banned. Toys, which are harmfulk to chilsdren, should be banned.(The ks of death...)[/nq]
However,
Toys which are harmful to children should be banned. Toys, that are harmful to children, should be banned.

Simply, there's no h

[nq:2]Toys that are harmful to children should be banned. Toys, which are harmfulk to chilsdren, should be banned.[/nq]
[nq:1](The ks of death...) However, Toys which are harmful to children should be banned. Toys, that are harmful to children, should be banned. Simply, there's no hard and fast rule, and the two are by and large interchangeable.[/nq]
Not so interchangeable!
(1) We boug

[nq:2]Toys that are harmful to children should be banned. Toys, which are harmfulk to chilsdren, should be banned.[/nq]
[nq:1](The ks of death...) However, Toys which are harmful to children should be banned. Toys, that are harmful to children, should be banned. Simply, there's no hard and fast rule, and the two are by and large interchangeable.[/nq]
Depends which century you're living in.

[nq:1]Not so interchangeable! (1) We bought everything that there was at the market. (2) We bought everything which there was at the market. How does (2) sound to you with "which"? Maybe, a bit awkward...[/nq]
Not remotely.
[nq:1]How about this pair? (3) He's no longer the athlete that he used to be. (4) He's no longer the athlete who he used to be.[/nq]
"Who" is another word altogethe

[nq:2](The ks of death...) However, Toys which are harmful to ... fast rule, and the two are by and large interchangeable.[/nq]
[nq:1]Depends which century you're living in.Or where you're living, as this group so often concludes.[/nq]
Personally, my body's living in the 21st century, but my linguistic habits are from a few decades earlier.
Cheers - Ian

[nq:2]Depends which century you're living in.[/nq]
[nq:1]Or where you're living, as this group so often concludes. Personally, my body's living in the 21st century, but my linguistic habits are from a few decades earlier. Cheers - Ian[/nq]
'Which' is preceded by a comma and provides additional info about an antecedent.
I took the horse, which was lame, back to the stable. 'That' does n

[nq:2](The ks of death...) However, Toys which are harmful to ... fast rule, and the two are by and large interchangeable.[/nq]
[nq:1]Not so interchangeable![/nq]
They are not always interchangable, but are often interchangable, unless you are using Microsoft Word. In that case, you must stick to a certain set of rules, and you can no longer write sentences that use the passive voice.