Hello! I just saw a video, but I got confused. The video said these sentences:
"The picture which hangs on the wall is old." (defining)
"The building, which is very old, needs repairing." (non-defining)
I don't see the difference. For example, if I just say:
"The picture is old", is the same than "The building needs repairing."
I don't know which is the picture we're talking about, the same with the building. Can someone explain me what is the difference? What is the reason that makes me understand "The building needs repairing" as a complete sentence that is giving extra details telling me that "it's very old", compared with "The picture is old", which is incomplete and needs more information like "hangs on the wall" to understand it?
olive 1410 I don't see the difference. You are not supposed to compare the "picture" sentence with the "building" sentence. You compare each sentence in its two forms, with and without the commas.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
olive 1410I don't see the difference.
You are not supposed to compare the "picture" sentence with the "building" sentence. You compare each sentence in its two forms, with and without the commas. This matter is about the commas, mostly. Also, "which" is better reserved for the non-defining role, a point that your YouTuber ignored.
olive
olive 1410 Difference between defining and non-defining relative clauses
Non-defining relative clauses
The reference to the antecedent is already completely known; the which-clause does not add any information which helps to specify what the antecedent refers to. Non-defining relative clauses are like parenthetical remarks. They alw