Difference?
I thought he would’ve let you know about it.
vs.
I thought he would let you know about it.
Whats the difference in meaning between them?
Top answer
The meaning of the two is the same: He did not let you know about it, when I assumed he would. The only difference is in the tone of the sentence. " "Would've" is pronounced "WOOD-duvv," which has muting effect on the word "would," which softens the tone of the whole sentence).
- The meaning of the two is the same: He did not let you know about it, when I assumed he would.
- The only difference is in the tone of the sentence.
- " "Would've" is pronounced "WOOD-duvv," which has muting effect on the word "would," which softens the tone of the whole sentence).
- The speaker here is upset that the person ("he" in the sentence) didn't let you know, when he (the speaker) assumed that he would, and is almost apologizing for it.
- The second sentence is direct and straightforward, with no hint of any kind of apology.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
The meaning of the two is the same: He did not let you know about it, when I assumed he would. The only difference is in the tone of the sentence. The first sentence has an apologetic tone to it (the result of the extra word "have." "Would've" is pronounced "WOOD-duvv," which has muting effect on the word "would," which softens the tone of the whole sentence). The speaker here is upset th
0
Related Questions