0
Knightofsports Posted 13 years ago
Grammar
didn't/weren't
Because you always say you want to lower expenses and everything. I'm just wondering if there's something in particular you would want to do if I didn't have so much expenses.
Or
Because you always say you want to lower expenses and everything. I'm just wondering if there's something in particular you would want to do if It weren't for all my expenses.
ARe both useable and is there a difference?
Thanks!
Or
Because you always say you want to lower expenses and everything. I'm just wondering if there's something in particular you would want to do if It weren't for all my expenses.
ARe both useable and is there a difference?
Thanks!
Top answer
so many expenses Both are ungainly sentences. No big difference.
- so many expenses Both are ungainly sentences.
- No big difference.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
4 Answers
0
0
Cliveso many expensesBoth are ungainly sentences. No big difference.Could you make it better if you feel that it's ungainly.
00
This is firmer and tighter. But does it still reflect your meaning?
You always want to reduce our expenses. Is there something you would do if I didn't spend so much?
You always want to reduce our expenses. Is there something you would do if I didn't spend so much?
00
CliveThis is firmer and tighter. But does it still reflectyour meaning?You always want to reduce our expenses. Is there something you would do if I didn't spend so much?Sounds good to me. Thank you.
0
Related Questions