I don't think any change is required for the sentence mentioned above. successor There was a deliberate obstruction on the part of the authorities. I would use "obstruction" rather than " hindrance, Although, they have the same meaning.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
successorThere was a deliberate obstruction on the part of the authorities.I would use "obstruction" rather than " hindrance, Although, they have the same meaning.
successorThere was deliberate obstruction on the part of the authorities.The sentence is fine as written. Don't use an article in front of "deliberate."
RayHDon't use an article in front of "deliberate."Isn't " a " needed in here ? "There was a deliberate obstruction ... "
YoungBuddyIsn't " a " needed in here ? "There was a deliberate obstruction ... "Not in the sentence as originally posted. There are situations where an article is required, but not in this case.
YoungBuddyIsn't " a " needed in here ? "There was a deliberate obstruction ... "No. obstruction is being used more abstractly here. Deliberately obstructive acts were carried out. So it's like saying, There was 'carrying out of deliberately obstructive acts'.