Reegis Why the first one doesn't have 'the' but the second and third have it? You need does between "Why" and "the".
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
ReegisWhy the first one doesn't have 'the' but the second and third have it?You need does between "Why" and "the".
ReegisWhy doesn't the first oneIt's just one of those random inconsistencies that life is full of. I would have used "The" for all three.doesn'thave 'the', but the second and third have it?
CalifJim It's just one of those random inconsistencies that life is full of
ReegisDo native speakers often say things this way (without inversion) in colloquial English?No. It has a distinctly "foreign" ring to it.
ReegisDo I understand you correctly that they should have 'the' because it is part of their name (like the Equator, the North Pole or the Atlantic)?Right.
CalifJimNo. It has a distinctly "foreign" ring to it.Good to know then:)
CalifJimRight.Thanks.
CalifJimThere is nothing special about a definition. It follows the same conventions as any other kind of sentence.Hmmm, I remember that I was told to not use articles when making definitions
ReegisI was told to not use articles when making definitions of the given item.That's a dictionary definition, or something that goes in a glossary of terminology in the appendices of a book. The reason for dropping the articles is to facilitate the organization of words alphabetically in written text.
Reegisit depends on how exactly we createYes. That's my point exactly in my previous post.
CalifJimIf Wiki were a standard hard-copy kind of dictionary, the discrepancy you noticed would not have occurred,I see you used here a mixed conditional, and the one that was the least intuitive for me. Now I can remember it better since your sentence is intuitive:)
CalifJim Yes. That's my point exactly in my previous post.CJ