Shouldn't she have said "diplomatic relations" or something like that instead? No, and yes. It's a typo.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AnonymousIs there a word "diplomations" in English?Shouldn't she have said "diplomatic relations" or something like that instead?No, and yes. It's a typo.
AnonymousIs there a word "diplomations" in English?No.
AnonymousShouldn't she have said "diplomatic relations" or something like that instead?Yes. If you have not copied a faulty transcript which deleted those missing letters, then it is possibly a neologism in journalism or politics.
AnonymousSo, I guess it's an error on her part??I don't think so; she seems bright and well-spoken enough (for a FOX reporter). I still think it is just a very new portmanteau word. But we'll just have to wait and see if it pops up in other conversations or news articles.
Mister MicawberI don't think so; she seems bright and well-spoken enough (for a FOX reporter). I still think it is just a very new portmanteau word. But we'll just have to wait and see if it pops up in other conversations or news articles.I just found some Twitter and Facebook comments that basically ridicules her using the word "diplomations".
AnonymousSo I guess it's her mistake.I wouldn't trust T and F for grammar points.
Mister MicawberI wouldn't trust T and F for grammar points.It's not that I would.
Anonymous, I for one think it's neither here nor there that the speaker "seems bright and well-spoken enough" when you really can't find any independent evidence of the word actually being used.I am not here to back up all my statements with footnotes. I rely on my experience and knowledge of the language. If you will not accept expert advice, then just qui