0
Tkacka15 Posted 11 years ago
Grammar

Countable noun

Are there countable nouns that cannot be used in plural?
  

Top answer

There are some plurals that are the same as the singular: moose, deer, fish, etc.

  • There are some plurals that are the same as the singular: moose, deer, fish, etc.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

6 Answers
0
There are some plurals that are the same as the singular: moose, deer, fish, etc.
0
VorparThere are some plurals that are the same as the singular: moose, deer, fish, etc.
Thank you for the reply. Yes, but they, nevertheless, can be used both in singular and plural. Actually, I wonder whether there are specific nouns which are used in a singular form but cannot be used in plural. For example, when A says I must have a think about it, c
0
tkacka15when A says I must have a think about it, can he or she "have two thinks about it"?
It would be regarded as a sort of joke, but it's definitely possible.

CJ
0
CalifJim it's definitely possible.
But, as you say, it would be regarded as a joke.

While 'have a think' may not be the most formal of English, I don't think many would regard it as incorrect, but we would raise our eyebrows at 'have two/some thinks'. That is not standard English, even informal English. A group of people would scratch th
0
Thank you, CJ and Fivejedjon, for your replies.
0
It's a very interesting question. My initial reaction was that there were no singular-only nouns, but your 'a think' question made me wonder. I haven't found a satisfactory answer yet, but I'm working on it.

Related Questions