0
Osmancataloluk Posted 10 years ago
Essay & Composition Writing
Could you please correct my sentence, please, regards
ART and ARTIST
On the other hand, in terms of providing any thing in the universe that is beautiful, good and amazing with human being and in return expecting him admire to such things, the art should be an objective of the artist.
On the other hand, in terms of providing any thing in the universe that is beautiful, good and amazing with human being and in return expecting him admire to such things, the art should be an objective of the artist.
Top answer
ART and ARTIST On the other hand, in terms of providing anything in some point of the universe that is beautiful, fine and amazing with human beings and in return expecting him to admire such things, the art should be an objective of the artist.
- ART and ARTIST On the other hand, in terms of providing anything in some point of the universe that is beautiful, fine and amazing with human beings and in return expecting him to admire such things, the art should be an objective of the artist.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
11 Answers
0
ART and ARTIST
On the other hand, in terms of providing anything in some point of the universe that is beautiful, fine and amazing with human beings and in return expecting him to admire such things, the art should be an objective of the artist.
On the other hand, in terms of providing anything in some point of the universe that is beautiful, fine and amazing with human beings and in return expecting him to admire such things, the art should be an objective of the artist.
00
I have no idea what you are trying to say.
Human beings live only in one place in the entire universe, and that is on planet Earth.
The objective of an artist is to produce art.
Some contemporary art is not fine, amazing or beautiful. It is disgusting, horrifying and shocking. But it is still art.
Case in point: Damien Hirst, In His Infinite Wisdom, 2003
Human beings live only in one place in the entire universe, and that is on planet Earth.
The objective of an artist is to produce art.
Some contemporary art is not fine, amazing or beautiful. It is disgusting, horrifying and shocking. But it is still art.
Case in point: Damien Hirst, In His Infinite Wisdom, 2003
00
You are right my teacher,
I have no objection to that.
What I mean is that.
ART and ARTIST
On the other hand, in terms of providing anything in some point of the universe (the universe in the thought of the artist) that is beautiful, fine and amazing with human beings and in return expecting him to admire such things, the art should be an objective of the artist.
As you said/p
I have no objection to that.
What I mean is that.
ART and ARTIST
On the other hand, in terms of providing anything in some point of the universe (the universe in the thought of the artist) that is beautiful, fine and amazing with human beings and in return expecting him to admire such things, the art should be an objective of the artist.
As you said/p
00
0
Oouuch! Sorry my teacher,
Then I change it a bit;
how is this like?
On the other hand, the talent of the artist always looks for something that is called beautiful, fine, amazing, and or perplexing by the public and in return he expects admiration and respect which should be objectives of the artist.
Then I change it a bit;
how is this like?
On the other hand, the talent of the artist always looks for something that is called beautiful, fine, amazing, and or perplexing by the public and in return he expects admiration and respect which should be objectives of the artist.
00
I think this might be what you mean.
On the other hand, the talent of the artist always looks for strives to create something that is called beautiful, fine, amazing, and or perplexing by the public, and in return he expects admiration and respect. Public admiration (??) should be the objective of the artist.
On the other hand, t
00
Hi it is,
On the other hand, the artist always strives to create something that is called beautiful, fine, amazing, or perplexing by the public, and in return he expects admiration and respect. Creation of such awareness in public should be the objective of the artist.
regards
On the other hand, the artist always strives to create something that is called beautiful, fine, amazing, or perplexing by the public, and in return he expects admiration and respect. Creation of such awareness in public should be the objective of the artist.
regards
00
Hi Teacher,
can I put it like this,
On the other hand, the artist always strives to create something that is called beautiful, fine, amazing, or perplexing by the public, and in return he expects admiration and respect. Creation of such awareness in public, then, is regarded to be the objective of the artist.
can I put it like this,
On the other hand, the artist always strives to create something that is called beautiful, fine, amazing, or perplexing by the public, and in return he expects admiration and respect. Creation of such awareness in public, then, is regarded to be the objective of the artist.
00
osmancatalolukCreation of such awareness in the public, then, is regarded to be the objective of the artist.What kind of awareness are you talking about? The public is already aware of "beautiful, fine, etc.". things because they recognize things with these qualities, and recognize them. They don't need to be made aware of that.
The onl
00
Art is not always performed for money? Yes that is true the artist earn fame for his/her product but earning money shouldn't be the object and fame as well. But first he/she should be known by the mass by his/her product. Then fame and money can be said. Isn't that right or am I wrong? Your way is abit too capitalistic way I guess. What do you think?
0
Related Questions