Somebody told me that the difference between the past form of 'can' - could and the past form of 'be able to' - was/were able to is that "could" is used to talk about a general ability in the past and 'be able to' is used to talk about both general and one-time ability in the past. By the way, is that true, teachers?
He also gave me a few examples to show the difference:
1). He could run for 10 miles at a stretch when he was young. Or He was able to run for 10 miles at a stretch when he was young. 2-).When the boat was about to sink, he was able to/hemanaged to jump off it. (Not: he could jump off it.) 3). His wife was very angry with him, but eventually, he was ableto/he managed to make her calm. (Not: he could make her calm.)
Dear teachers, I don't know if what that guy told me about this difference between 'could' and 'be able to' is right. I just want your opinions on this. Is there really any such a difference between 'could' and 'be able to'?
Thank you.
Top answer
I think your friend made a very good point. Your examples are correct.
— Blue Jay
I think your friend made a very good point.
Your examples are correct.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.