0
Anonymous Posted 12 years ago
Grammar

Could or can

Do both could and can mean the same thing in this phrase:

You cannot ignore that.

You could not ignore that.

Please advice?
  

Top answer

"You could not ignore that" would often be referring to a past event.

  • "You could not ignore that" would often be referring to a past event.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

11 Answers
0
"You could not ignore that" would often be referring to a past event.
0
So, it is always better to use can if we are talking about now, the present, or a fact. For example, you can'to ask him this question; you can't avoid him now. I just get confused because sometimes both seem possible even for the present.
0
Non-past "could" tends to be hypothetical, tentative or suggestive. For example, "We could go and visit your aunt", "I couldn't do that even if I practised for a year", "It could all go horribly wrong". Your sentence, on the other hand, would normally be used in a more definite way.
0
Got it. So the ones I provided would normally be used with can since they are more appropriate to being definite. Am I right?

So when something is more definite, can should be used? As in that can't be true , not could not; we can or could have ten people for dinner tonight; do you think he can or could win the race. So can is basically more definite compared to could in cases where both
0
Hello teacher, would you please confirm what I wrote in my last message. Sorry to bother you and thanks again.
0
AnonymousGot it. So the ones I provided would normally be used with can since they are more appropriate to being definite. Am I right?
Normally yes.
AnonymousHow about in the last sentence:
That one is not very clear-cut. You could say that "can" seems more definite, but in practice the end result in that sentence is no
0
Thank you very much. I really appreciate your help.
0
Teacher were you referring to this example that it is not very clear cut, and that can seems more definite buy in practice the end result is not hugely different: do you think he can or could win the race. would the same apply for: we could or can have ten people for dinner tonight... which also does not have a hug impact on the end result. Did I understand correctly?

Thank you again.
0
AnonymousTeacher were you referring to this example that it is not very clear cut, and that can seems more definite buy in practice the end result is not hugely different: do you think he can or could win the race. would the same apply for: we could or can have ten people for dinner tonight... which also does not have a hug impact on the end result. Did I understand corre
0
No, sorry my bad. I was referring to the examples:

we can or could have ten people for dinner tonight; do you think he can or could win the race.

So are both can and could possible? And is what I have assumed and what you have suggested that can is basically more definite compared to could, in cases where both could/can be used, as in the two examples above.

Related Questions