0
Lucus Ong Posted 17 years ago
Grammar
Could anybody correct these two sentences for me?
Are both of them right?
If we don’t mean to express sitting and involving in continuous tense can we omit who is and which is?
Are they complete sentences?
When can we omit who is , which is and so on by this way?
1) The girl, sitting there is my sister.
2) Teenager problem, involving addicting to watching sex videos in the internet should be concerned.
If we don’t mean to express sitting and involving in continuous tense can we omit who is and which is?
Are they complete sentences?
When can we omit who is , which is and so on by this way?
1) The girl, sitting there is my sister.
2) Teenager problem, involving addicting to watching sex videos in the internet should be concerned.
Top answer
If you want a relative clause equivalent of the type that occurs in sentence 1, no comma is used if the relative clause is restrictive. Therefore, The girl sitting [over] there is my sister. I'm not quite sure what you want to say in sentence 2.
- If you want a relative clause equivalent of the type that occurs in sentence 1, no comma is used if the relative clause is restrictive.
- Therefore, The girl sitting [over] there is my sister.
- I'm not quite sure what you want to say in sentence 2.
- Perhaps: We should be concerned about teenagers who tend to watch *** videos on the Internet.
- CB
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
If you want a relative clause equivalent of the type that occurs in sentence 1, no comma is used if the relative clause is restrictive. Therefore, The girl sitting [over] there is my sister.
I'm not quite sure what you want to say in sentence 2. Perhaps: We should be concerned about teenagers who tend to watch *** videos on the Internet.
CB
I'm not quite sure what you want to say in sentence 2. Perhaps: We should be concerned about teenagers who tend to watch *** videos on the Internet.
CB
0
Related Questions