Coul someone check this essay?

Hi everyone, could somebody check this 4-paragraph essay for me?

Here it is:
Social Darwinism was originated in Europe by Charles Darwin who believed that human can evolve like some animals and plants to become a new one with special and new features. This term was based on the theory "survival of the fittest". This theory stated that people have to be in strugle to get food, healing and jobs. Social Darwinism means that some people are better than other and have more advantages only because of their abnormal genes. In fact, applying tgis theory will make many problems for societies like racism because it says that the existence will be for the strongest, not like what Spencer had argued"through competition, social evolution would automatically produce prosperity and personal liberty".

Firstly, Darwinism is only a theory, and it failed because it didn't depend on direct evidence that can convince the people and the scientists. In addition, in gungle law, the strongest will hold his position for ever, and the weaker will hold his weakness. For example, Lions are the stringest kind of animals, and deers are easy victims for them. In real world, the sovereign will not hold their position for ever because people will take it when it is the time for this. Unlike what reform Darwinists argued "human beings need new ideas and institutions as the adopt to changing conditions". We can derive some laws from permanent sources like holy books; also, the laws mustn't be based on Darwinism.

Furthermore, Darwinism has nothing to do to solve poverty, slavery and helping disabled people because it gave the right for the strongest to do what he wants, and also he shouldn't care about poors. For instance, Spencer said "the strong, the intelligent, the wealthy should reproduce themselves". In the same way, laws must only be applied on the poor people and those who have high classes, have the ability to override the laws "partly by subjecting those who remain the never - understand the conditions of existence".

In conclusion, I found that this theory can make critical problems everywhere it can be applied. It can cause problems for individuals and hamper their hope to develope as it says "we inherit our parents tempers, our parents' conscientiousness, shyness and ability". Despite the fact that many famous intellectuals adopted Darwinism like Karl Marks wgo argued "it is recognises how Darwin in beats and plants his English societies with its 'inventions' and Malthusian 'strugle for existence'", it will stay a dangerous theory that can destroy classes, races and might religions.

Thank you!