0
Anonymous Posted 14 years ago
Grammar

Correlative Conjunctions: not only, but also

Has the not only-but also correlative conjunction been used properly in the following sentence?
“I’d say not only are you going to lose all your old clients, but you’re also not going to get any new ones either."
I am open to suggestions on modifying the syntax so that the use of the correlative conjunction is correct. However, I'm also looking to make minimal changes (as the quoted material is part of a casual dialogue), if any at all, so please keep this in mind, if you will. Thank you all so much for your help and time.
  

Top answer

I'd do this: I’d say you're not only going to lose all your old clients, but you’re also not going to get any new ones.

  • I'd do this: I’d say you're not only going to lose all your old clients, but you’re also not going to get any new ones.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
I'd do this:

I’d say you're not only going to lose all your old clients, but you’re also not going to get any new ones.
0
Thank you very much, Mister Micawber.

The original drafted line of dialogue looked like this:
"I’d say not only are you going to lose all your old clients, you’re not going to get any new ones either."

I am a bit confused about how to advise the writer on this issue. Because the writer has used "not only," from an editorial standpoint, I am inclined to advise him to tack on "
0
I agree: leave it alone. It flows much better and sounds more naturally. One of the problems I saw with the one you posted was the redundance of 'but also' and 'either'.
0
Aha! Thank you for your input and for pointing out the redundancy issue. Very best to you.

Related Questions