I do agree with you (at least partially) when it comes to photography being an artistic representation of someone's creativity, but let's not get too abstract here. What I'm trying to direct your attention to is a particular picture's not being understood as a subjective artistic representation of a photographer's creative vision but merely as a personal reaction to the green color (being either too washed out/bleached/blanched or over-saturated). I hope this makes sense.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Perfect StrangerWhy is it incorrect to say bleak colors or bleak picture?I simply thought you had confused the meaning, since you set the phrasing as 'either too... or oversaturated'. 'Bleak' is not the opposite of 'oversaturated'.
Mister MicawberI simply thought you had confused the meaning, since you set the phrasing as 'either too... or oversaturated'. 'Bleak' is not the opposite of 'oversaturated'.Thanks for a quick reply. I have to say I'm a bit confused now. Does it mean I can't phrase a sentence like this one: The colors seem to be either too bleak or over-saturated.
Perfect StrangerDoes it mean I can't phrase a sentence like this one: The colors seem to be either too bleak or over-saturated. because these two adjectives are not opposite in meaning?I suppose you can, but it is confusing for the reader if he (like I) is not fully familiar with the context.