00 Yes02br 00I think living in is the correct idiomatic usage. 02br 02br 01i 00I agree with your comment. I certainly don't think that studying this industry in, for example, Victorian times would have been at all fascinating.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
| 00Mr. Gorbachev added, ''01b00The time we are living02b00 01font00in02font00 demands actions by the great powers, by the U.S. and the Sovie... October 11, 1986 World News 01b00...02b02td |
01cite10Clive12cite10It's not good style to repeat 'times'.12br
12br
11i10I agree with your comment. I certainly don't think that studying this industry 11b10in12b10, for example, Victorian times would have been at all fascinating. 15012i12br
12br
10Best wis
00don't you think that it will distort the structure of the sentence?12blockquote10No. I wouldn't call such a small change a distortion of the structure.02br
| 02br 02br 01font00It's not good style to repeat 'times'.02font00 I meant that in your original sentence, you used both the word 'time' and the word 'times'.00 This kind of repetition is not good style.02br 02br 01i01font |